Thursday, September 28, 2006

Beware the Leaked Memo: Iggsters have no reason to celebrate

As much as we love to hate the CPC, even the most diehard partisan has got to admit: they don't make mistakes like that. This leaked memo is just an attemt by the CPC to manipulate our process. Look at the timing: leaked at a time when Mr. Ignatieff's credibility in Western Canada will be severely hampered due to his infamous Carbon Tax. The CPC is getting pounded in Quebec because of their foreign policy - a foreign policy shared by Iggy. Yes, I'm sure the CPC is just TERRIFIED of Mr. Ignatieff. What a joke - Harper could wipe the floor with Iggy without batting an eye. The CPC is about as terrified of Iggy as they are of Bob Rae - and that's not very.

The candidate that they are afraid of is the one whose polling numbers indicate that he can take votes away from the CPC, BQ and NDP and who ranks #1 among the candidates in terms of the general population. That would be the national favourite: Ken Dryden.


At 6:46 p.m., Blogger Manitoba Liberal said...

When Dryden finishes ahead of only Martha Hall Findly in terms of delegates are you still going to be on the bandwagon?

At 8:42 a.m., Blogger Sinestra said...


At 3:22 p.m., Blogger Manitoba Liberal said...

So Dryden is going to make up the other 46% he needs and win this thing?

At 9:33 a.m., Blogger Sinestra said...

At this point any of the candidates has more potential for growth than Iggy. Dryden is still the best consensus candidate - despite what the blathering blogging Iggsters think. Are you coming to town for convention, Manitoba? We can discuss it then.

At 1:57 p.m., Blogger Manitoba Liberal said...

I'll be at the convention, I like Dryden (Did not like his Manitoba Team-nor did the rest of the Liberals in the province judging by how they fell flat on his face this past weekend)

I would take Dryden over Iggy and Dion and maybe Rae in a heartbeat. But coming from 4% of the delegates to win will easily be the biggest political upset in Canadian history.

At 3:28 p.m., Anonymous Anonymous said...

Watch subject. Bush goes ballistic about other countries being evil and dangerous, because they have weapons of mass destruction. But, he insists on building up even a more deadly supply of nuclear arms right here in the US. What do you think? What is he doing to us, and what is he doing to the world?
Our country is in debt until forever, we don't have jobs, and we live in fear. We have invaded a country and been responsible for thousands of deaths.
The more people that the government puts in jails, the safer we are told to think we are. The real terrorists are wherever they are, but they aren't living in a country with bars on the windows. We are.

At 11:35 p.m., Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bush and the Republicans were not protecting us on 9-11, and we aren't a lot safer now. We may be more afraid due to george bush, but are we safer? Being fearful does not necessarily make one safer. Fear can cause people to hide and cower. What do you think? How does that work in a democracy again? How does being more threatening make us more likeable?Isn't the country with
the most weapons the biggest threat to the rest of the world? When one country is the biggest threat to the rest of the world, isn't that likely to be the most hated country?
If ever there was ever a time in our nation's history that called for a change, this is it!
We have lost friends and influenced no one. No wonder most of the world thinks we suck. Thanks to what george bush has done to our country during the past three years, we do!


Post a Comment

<< Home